qcontinuum: (Default)
[personal profile] qcontinuum
Yesterday I snarked at [livejournal.com profile] botanist_keiko for her immature and primitive hysterical jealousy of the blatantly-obvious-and-yet-they-won't-admit-it relationship between her husband [livejournal.com profile] smiley_miles and [livejournal.com profile] doctor_bashir.

So she asked me out to dinner.

Humans can still surprise me reasonably often. To an entity who's billions of years old and has seen and done it all, that's a very valuable trait.

I also have to confess that after being turned down by two starship captains and a thief (not that the thief wasn't doing me a big, big favor by getting out of my life when she did), I find it flattering to have humans throwing themselves at me, even if the objective is obviously just to make her husband jealous. (As for whether he has anything to be jealous *of*... well, a Q doesn't kiss and tell, but if I claimed I'd been a perfect gentleman would anyone actually believe me? :-))

But this human monogamy thing. Also this human desire to deny same-sex attraction. You people have *got* to get *over* it.

Date: 2003-05-01 10:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smiley-miles.livejournal.com
Um.

That's outrageous, you charlatan. Stay away from my wife, you hear me?

I hope that'll do...

The sincerity virtually oozes from every pore.

Date: 2003-05-01 10:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qcontinuum.livejournal.com
I probably shouldn't be involving myself in this at all, but it's far too much fun.

Date: 2003-05-01 10:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smiley-miles.livejournal.com
You homewrecker. I am upset. And very angry.

I can tell.

Date: 2003-05-01 10:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qcontinuum.livejournal.com
You sound positively enraged.

(Why *didn't* I ever go back to DS9? Just because Sisko was too easy to provoke? There was so much entertainment to be had with everyone *else*...)

Date: 2003-05-01 10:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smiley-miles.livejournal.com
Look, you, are you insinuating something?

Why, whatever could make you think that?

Date: 2003-05-01 10:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qcontinuum.livejournal.com
To be *insinuating* something, I'd have to have something to insinuate, wouldn't I?

And you've so thoroughly assured the entire universe that there's nothing to be insinuated. Why, *everyone* believes you when you protest your mere friendship for [livejournal.com profile] doctorbashir.

Hmmph

Date: 2003-05-01 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smiley-miles.livejournal.com
So they should. We have a non-gay friendship in which no wistful yearning is involved. At all.

I am a happily married man.
I suspect that in the circumstances that may not work. Damn.

If you're so happily married...

Date: 2003-05-01 11:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qcontinuum.livejournal.com
...why is your wife exploring the wild flora of the Cretaceous Era with me?

Well, aside from the fact that you can't travel in time.

Date: 2003-05-01 11:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smiley-miles.livejournal.com
She's always been very keen on her flower thing, yes.

Didn't you make fun of me for doing this?

Date: 2003-05-01 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amanda-the-q.livejournal.com
I seem to recall some words about how sordid I was and how it was overly human of me to be having sex with people and stuff...

Jerk.

Also hypocrite. (See, I *do* know more than one word.)

No hypocrisy here.

Date: 2003-05-01 10:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qcontinuum.livejournal.com
No, child, I said that you were behaving entirely too much like a Q for someone whose avowed ambition is to prove to the universe that "we're not all jerks. At least I'm not."

Observing a tottering house of cards and putting just a teeny tiny card on the top to see if it will finally collapse is a very Q-like thing to do. I am utterly consistent.

Still a jerk.

Date: 2003-05-01 11:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amanda-the-q.livejournal.com
You're doing this to someone who has *kids*. I know kicking over anthills to watch them scurry is a Q pastime, but you of all people should know better than to do it with someone who has *children!*

You are such a jerk.

Because it's so much better...

Date: 2003-05-01 11:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qcontinuum.livejournal.com
...for children to be raised by two people who hate each other.

It's exactly *because* I have a child, and experience in the matter of hating your child's other parent, that this strikes me as a perfectly valid thing to do.

People who have nothing but resentment and anger for each other should break the hell up and share custody as far away from each other as possible. Believe me, this I know all too well.

February 2020

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718 19202122
23242526272829

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 13th, 2026 09:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios